"Why Your Employer's Long-Term Disability Plan May be a Scam"
Buy Robbery Without A Gun Now

Send Sample
Chapter To Me

Name:

Address:

Phone:



Fax:

E-mail:

Benjamin Glass
3915 Old Lee Highway
Suite 22-B
Fairfax, VA 22310

Phone: 703.591.9829

Great Legal Marketing Information

On the page below you can find links to documents, reports, publications and discussions provided by Great Legal Marketing, Inc..

Contact us for a consultation today.

Court Opinions

  • Met Life Shows Just How Arbitrary They Can Be [PDF]
    ERISA case involving MetLife's arbitrary denial of a LTD claim through willful misinterpretation of the claimants job requirements and ignoring the conflicting opinions of its very own medical reviewers.
  • McCauley v. First UNUM [PDF]
    This case has taken 15 years from filing for disability to legal resolution. Read the opinion.
  • Allen v. AT&T Disability Income Program [PDF]
    A psychiatric disability case in which the insurance companies psychiatrist recommended denial without any knowledge of the plaintiff's job, without interviewing the patient, and without making efforts to contact the treating mental health professionals.
  • Galvin v. UNUM Provident [PDF]
    A LTD case in which UNUM tries to explain away disability through circular logic. It doesn't work.
  • Schully v. Continental Casualty Company [PDF]
    U.S. District Court of Eastern Louisiana opinion on an LTD case in which plaintiff was awarded benefits after Court looked down upon the fact that IMEs had not examined patient nor made efforts to contact treating physicians.
  • Sedgwick Insurance Company v. Delsman [PDF]
    Court opinion dismissing a suit against a blogger who had a policy with the plaintiff and wrote about the terrible things the company and it's executives did in the name of profit. They sued him for defamation and copyright infringement for using their pictures on "Wanted" posters.
  • Toth v. INA [PDF]
    CIGNA doctors lose out on battle of opinion with plaintiff's treating physicians.
  • Velikanov v. Union Security Insurance [PDF]
    Opinion on an ERISA case in which the judge targets University Disability Consortium and their shady relationship with insurance companies.
  • Barteau v. Prudential [PDF]
    Prudential utilizes the common tactic of professing disability to Social Security while arguing non-disability to the courts. Here's a case in which it didn't work.
  • Solomon v. MetLife [PDF]
    The USDC of New York's Southern District thrashes the "independence" of IME Dr. Amy Hopkins.
  • Taylor v. SmithKline [PDF]
    The USDC of California's Central District rules on a case in which the Hartford's doctor, Beth Aaronsen, of the University Disability Consortium, ruled against disability while ignoring all except one of the claimants major medical problems.
  • Court Refuses To Vacate ERISA Ruling
    Excerpts from the US District Court opinion about an insurance company trying once again to deceive the public.
  • Denmark v. Liberty Life
    This appeal has generated thorny questions involving the appropriate standard of judicial review under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act

General Marketing Stuff